Fire Ecology and Wildlife: The Ecological Role of Fire in Natural Systems
Category: Ecology Topic: Fire regimes, prescribed burning, and wildlife Last verified: 2026-06-10
Fire is not an intruder in most of the world's ecosystems; it is one of their oldest and most formative processes. Charcoal in the geological record shows that wildfire has shaped terrestrial life since vascular plants first colonized land more than 400 million years ago, long predating any human influence [Scott & Glasspool 2006]. Across savannas, Mediterranean shrublands, boreal forests, and many temperate woodlands, recurrent fire has acted as a global-scale evolutionary and ecological force, selecting for plant traits, structuring animal communities, and maintaining biodiversity [Pausas & Keeley 2009; Bowman et al. 2009]. Understanding fire as an ecological process — rather than treating every flame as a disaster to be eliminated — is central to managing landscapes and the wildlife that depend on them. This article examines fire's evolutionary role, the concept of pyrodiversity, the species and traits adapted to fire, the consequences of long-term fire suppression, the place of prescribed and Indigenous burning, and the changing fire trends now emerging under a warming climate.
Fire as an Evolutionary Force
Fire is a property of the Earth system, not merely a local hazard. Its occurrence depends on three coupled ingredients: oxygen in the atmosphere, plant biomass to serve as fuel, and a source of ignition such as lightning [Bowman et al. 2009]. Because atmospheric oxygen has remained high enough to sustain combustion for hundreds of millions of years, fire has been a near-permanent feature of vegetated land. Charcoal deposits trace the diversification of fire systems across the Paleozoic and show that fire activity has fluctuated with atmospheric oxygen concentration over deep time [Scott & Glasspool 2006].
Across that long history, fire has functioned as a kind of global herbivore — consuming vegetation, recycling nutrients, and exerting selective pressure on plants in ways analogous to large grazing animals [Bond & Keeley 2005]. Many of the world's most distinctive biomes, including grassy savannas and Mediterranean-type shrublands, are maintained by recurrent fire rather than by climate alone; without periodic burning, woody plants would often replace the open, flammable vegetation that characterizes them [Bond & Keeley 2005; Pausas & Keeley 2009]. Fire, in this sense, is not external to these ecosystems. It is an internal regulator that has helped shape their composition, structure, and the life histories of the organisms living within them [Pausas & Keeley 2009].
Fire Regimes and Pyrodiversity
Ecologists describe the pattern of fire in a landscape through its fire regime — the characteristic frequency, intensity, seasonality, size, and spatial pattern of fires in a given place [Bowman et al. 2009]. Fire regimes vary enormously: a tropical savanna may burn every one to three years at low intensity, while a boreal forest or chaparral stand may burn at high intensity only once in many decades. Each regime selects for a different suite of plants and animals, and a change in any of its components can reshape an entire community [Bowman et al. 2009; Bradstock et al. 2012].
A central principle to emerge from fire ecology is that pyrodiversity begets biodiversity — the idea that a variety of fire histories across a landscape supports a greater variety of species than any single, uniform fire pattern [Krebs et al. 2010; Bradstock et al. 2012]. When patches of recently burned, intermediate, and long-unburned vegetation coexist, they provide a mosaic of habitats: open ground and fresh regrowth favored by some species, dense mature cover required by others, and the full range of conditions in between. This heterogeneity allows species with different requirements to persist together within the same region [Krebs et al. 2010]. The implication for management is significant — maintaining biodiversity often depends less on excluding fire than on sustaining variation in how, when, and where fire occurs [Moreira et al. 2011].
The pyrodiversity principle is not unlimited or automatic. Its strength varies among ecosystems and taxonomic groups, and an excess of fire — too frequent or too severe — can erode diversity just as readily as too little [Bradstock et al. 2012; Moreira et al. 2011]. The practical question is therefore not simply "more fire" or "less fire," but what configuration of fire regimes best sustains the species native to a particular landscape.
Fire-Adapted Species and Traits
In fire-prone ecosystems, recurrent burning has selected for an array of specialized traits. Many plants survive fire directly: thick, insulating bark protects the living tissue of trees such as pines and eucalypts, while species that are top-killed regenerate by resprouting from protected buds at or below the soil surface [Pausas & Keeley 2009; Bond & Keeley 2005]. Others depend on fire to reproduce. Serotinous species hold their seeds in woody cones or fruits that open only after the heat of a fire, releasing seed onto a freshly cleared and nutrient-enriched seedbed, and some species require heat or smoke as a direct cue to germinate [Pausas & Keeley 2009; Bond & Keeley 2005]. These are not incidental tolerances but adaptations honed by repeated exposure to fire over evolutionary time [Pausas & Keeley 2009].
Fire also influences the soils on which plant and animal communities depend. Burning alters soil chemistry, structure, and biology — releasing nutrients in ash, sometimes increasing short-term availability, but at high severity also damaging soil organic matter, microbial communities, and the soil's capacity to retain water [Certini 2005]. The magnitude of these effects depends strongly on fire intensity and the pre-fire condition of the site, which is one reason fire severity, not merely fire presence, matters so much to ecological outcomes [Certini 2005].
For wildlife, the consequences of fire are mediated largely through habitat. Animals respond not to fire as an event but to the changes it produces in vegetation structure, food availability, and cover. A mosaic of burned and unburned patches creates the varied habitat conditions that allow different animal species to find what they need across a landscape, which is why pyrodiversity is so closely tied to faunal diversity [Krebs et al. 2010; Moreira et al. 2011].
Fire Suppression and Its Consequences
For much of the twentieth century, fire was treated primarily as a threat to be excluded. In many fire-adapted landscapes, decades of aggressive suppression interrupted the recurrent low- to moderate-intensity fires to which the vegetation was adapted. A well-documented consequence is fuel accumulation: in the absence of periodic burning, dead vegetation, leaf litter, and dense understory growth build up over time, increasing the quantity and continuity of flammable material [Marlon et al. 2008; Moreira et al. 2011].
This accumulation produces what is sometimes called a fire debt — a buildup of unburned fuel that raises the likelihood of larger and more intense fires when ignition eventually occurs [Marlon et al. 2008]. Paleoecological and historical reconstructions across western North America show that biomass burning declined sharply in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries, in part because of fire suppression and land-use change, even as the conditions for severe fire were being set in place [Marlon et al. 2008]. Suppression can thus convert a regime of frequent, survivable fires into one of rarer but more destructive ones — a shift with consequences for both ecosystems and the species adapted to the original regime [Moreira et al. 2011].
The ecological costs of excluding fire extend beyond fuel. Where recurrent fire once maintained open habitats, suppression allows woody encroachment and the loss of the open conditions on which many fire-dependent plants and animals rely [Bond & Keeley 2005; Moreira et al. 2011]. For these systems, the absence of fire is itself a form of disturbance.
Prescribed Fire and Indigenous Burning Practices
Recognition that fire is integral to many ecosystems has driven renewed interest in deliberately applying it. Prescribed burning — the intentional, controlled use of fire under specified weather and fuel conditions — is now a core management tool in fire-prone landscapes, used to reduce hazardous fuel loads, restore fire-adapted vegetation, and sustain the habitat heterogeneity that supports biodiversity [Moreira et al. 2011; Bradstock et al. 2012]. Designing such programs well requires matching the timing, frequency, and pattern of burning to the needs of the species present, which is precisely where the pyrodiversity principle becomes a practical guide [Krebs et al. 2010; Moreira et al. 2011].
Long before formal fire management, many Indigenous peoples used fire deliberately and skillfully to shape landscapes. In Australia, sustained Aboriginal burning over tens of thousands of years helped create fine-grained habitat mosaics and influenced the distribution of vegetation and the fire regimes of the continent [Bowman et al. 2009; Bradstock et al. 2012]. Globally, the historical record makes clear that humans have been an ignition source and a fire manager across much of the inhabited world, interacting with climate to shape fire patterns over millennia [Marlon et al. 2008; Bowman et al. 2009]. Contemporary land management increasingly looks to this body of knowledge, integrating traditional burning practices with ecological science to manage fuel, biodiversity, and risk in partnership with Indigenous communities [Bradstock et al. 2012].
Megafire Trends Under Climate Change
While many ecosystems need fire, the character of fire is changing. Warming temperatures, increased atmospheric aridity, and longer dry seasons are extending fire seasons and increasing the flammability of vegetation across many regions [Abatzoglou & Williams 2016]. In the forests of the western United States, anthropogenic climate change has measurably increased fuel aridity and is estimated to have nearly doubled the cumulative forest area burned over recent decades relative to what would be expected without that warming [Abatzoglou & Williams 2016].
These trends interact dangerously with the legacy of fire suppression. Where decades of fuel accumulation coincide with hotter, drier conditions, the result can be very large, high-intensity megafires that burn outside the range to which local ecosystems are adapted [Marlon et al. 2008; Abatzoglou & Williams 2016]. Such fires can exceed the regenerative capacity of even fire-adapted vegetation, kill fire-resistant mature trees, degrade soils, and convert forest to other vegetation types — outcomes very different from the recurrent, survivable fires that historically maintained these systems [Certini 2005; Bowman et al. 2009].
The conservation challenge, then, is not to eliminate fire but to restore and sustain ecologically appropriate fire while reducing the risk of regime-altering megafire. That means using prescribed and cultural burning to address fuel debt, protecting the habitat heterogeneity that biodiversity depends on, and confronting the climatic drivers that are pushing fire activity beyond historical bounds [Moreira et al. 2011; Abatzoglou & Williams 2016].
How Readers Can Help
Understand fire's ecological role. Much public discussion treats all fire as catastrophe. Learning to distinguish ecologically beneficial fire from regime-altering megafire — and sharing that understanding — supports better-informed land-management decisions in your community.
Support science-based fire management. Prescribed burning and Indigenous cultural burning are well-supported tools for reducing fuel loads and maintaining biodiversity. Where land-management agencies propose carefully planned prescribed-fire programs, informed public support helps make them possible.
Engage with land-use and climate policy. Because climate change is extending fire seasons and increasing fuel aridity [Abatzoglou & Williams 2016], policies that reduce greenhouse-gas emissions are also fire-management policies. Land-use planning that limits development in high-risk areas reduces both human exposure and pressure to suppress all fire indiscriminately.
Contribute to citizen science. Recording wildlife observations and post-fire vegetation recovery through established monitoring platforms adds to the data ecologists use to understand how species respond to fire.
Reduce avoidable ignitions. Most damaging unplanned fires in inhabited landscapes are human-caused. Following local fire restrictions and exercising care with any ignition source reduces the frequency of fires that occur in the wrong place, at the wrong time, or under dangerous conditions.
References
[Abatzoglou & Williams 2016] Abatzoglou, J.T. & Williams, A.P. (2016). Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(42), 11770–11775. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607171113
[Bond & Keeley 2005] Bond, W.J. & Keeley, J.E. (2005). Fire as a global 'herbivore': the ecology and evolution of flammable ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(7), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.025
[Bowman et al. 2009] Bowman, D.M.J.S., Balch, J.K., Artaxo, P., Bond, W.J., Carlson, J.M., Cochrane, M.A., D'Antonio, C.M., DeFries, R.S., Doyle, J.C., Harrison, S.P., Johnston, F.H., Keeley, J.E., Krawchuk, M.A., Kull, C.A., Marston, J.B., Moritz, M.A., Prentice, I.C., Roos, C.I., Scott, A.C., Swetnam, T.W., van der Werf, G.R. & Pyne, S.J. (2009). Fire in the Earth System. Science, 324(5926), 481–484. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163886
[Bradstock et al. 2012] Bradstock, R.A., Gill, A.M. & Williams, R.J. (Eds.). (2012). Flammable Australia: Fire Regimes, Biodiversity and Ecosystems in a Changing World. Collingwood, VIC: CSIRO Publishing / Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780643104822. https://www.publish.csiro.au/book/6586/
[Certini 2005] Certini, G. (2005). Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review. Oecologia, 143(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1788-8
[Krebs et al. 2010] Krebs, P., Pezzatti, G.B., Mazzoleni, S., Talbot, L.M. & Conedera, M. (2010). Fire regime: history and definition of a key concept in disturbance ecology. Theory in Biosciences, 129(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-010-0082-z
[Marlon et al. 2008] Marlon, J.R., Bartlein, P.J., Carcaillet, C., Gavin, D.G., Harrison, S.P., Higuera, P.E., Joos, F., Power, M.J. & Prentice, I.C. (2008). Climate and human influences on global biomass burning over the past two millennia. Nature Geoscience, 1, 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo313
[Moreira et al. 2011] Moreira, F., Viedma, O., Arianoutsou, M., Curt, T., Koutsias, N., Rigolot, E., Barbati, A., Corona, P., Vaz, P., Xanthopoulos, G., Mouillot, F. & Bilgili, E. (2011). Landscape – wildfire interactions in southern Europe: Implications for landscape management. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(10), 2389–2402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.028
[Pausas & Keeley 2009] Pausas, J.G. & Keeley, J.E. (2009). A burning story: the role of fire in the history of life. BioScience, 59(7), 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.7.10
[Scott & Glasspool 2006] Scott, A.C. & Glasspool, I.J. (2006). The diversification of Paleozoic fire systems and fluctuations in atmospheric oxygen concentration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(29), 10861–10865. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604090103